18Mar 2014 by Grant Fritchey 2 Comments

Finding Mistakes

SQL Server, T-SQL
Ever had that moment where you start getting errors from code that you've tested a million times? I had that one recently. I had this little bit of code for pulling information directly from query plans in cache: WITH XMLNAMESPACES(DEFAULT N'http://schemas.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2004/07/showplan'), QueryPlans AS ( SELECT RelOp.pln.value(N'@PhysicalOp', N'varchar(50)') AS OperatorName, RelOp.pln.value(N'@NodeId',N'integer') AS NodeId, RelOp.pln.value(N'@EstimateCPU', N'decimal(10,9)') AS CPUCost, RelOp.pln.value(N'@EstimateIO', N'decimal(10,9)') AS IOCost, dest.text FROM sys.dm_exec_query_stats AS deqs CROSS APPLY sys.dm_exec_sql_text(deqs.sql_handle) AS dest CROSS APPLY sys.dm_exec_query_plan(deqs.plan_handle) AS deqp CROSS APPLY deqp.query_plan.nodes(N'//RelOp') RelOp (pln) ) SELECT qp.OperatorName, qp.NodeId, qp.CPUCost, qp.IOCost, qp.CPUCost + qp.IOCost AS EstimatedCost FROM QueryPlans AS qp WHERE qp.text = 'some query or other in cache' ORDER BY EstimatedCost DESC; I've probably run this... I don't know how many times. But... I'm suddenly getting an error: Msg 8114, Level 16, State 5,…
Read More
11Mar 2014 by Grant Fritchey 4 Comments

sp_updatestats Is Not Smart

SQL Server, T-SQL
No, I don't mean the use of sp_updatestats is not smart. It's a fine, quick mechanism for getting statistics updated in your system. But the procedure itself is not smart. I keep seeing stuff like "sp_updatestats knows which statistics need to be updated" and similar statements. Nope. Not true. Wanna know how I know? It's tricky. Ready? I looked at the query. It's there, in full, at the bottom of the article (2014 CTP2 version, just in case yours is slightly different, like, for example, no Hekaton logic). Let's focus on just this bit: if ((@ind_rowmodctr <> 0) or ((@is_ver_current is not null) and (@is_ver_current = 0))) The most interesting part is right at the front, @ind_rowmodctr <> 0. That value is loaded with the cursor and comes from sys.sysindexes and the rowmodctr column…
Read More
27Feb 2014 by Grant Fritchey 2 Comments

Let’s Talk Query Tuning

Professional Development, SQL Server, T-SQL
I spend quite a bit of time writing about query tuning on this blog. I've written (re-written and am actively re-writing) books on query tuning. But what I like most is talking about query tuning. I love giving sessions at various events on different aspects of query tuning, but, what I like the most is spending a whole day, trying to do a complete brain dump to get as much information out there as possible. Sound attractive? Then I've got a great deal for you. Come to Louisville on June 20th, 2014. We will talk query tuning at length. You have a specific question? Let's get it answered. Then, the next day, we can all go to SQL Saturday 286 there in Louisville to get more learning and some serious…
Read More
18Feb 2014 by Grant Fritchey 14 Comments

The CASE Statement and Performance

SQL Server, T-SQL
In case you don't know, this query: UPDATE dbo.Test1 SET C2 = 2 WHERE C1 LIKE '%33%'; Will run quite a bit slower than this query: UPDATE dbo.Test1 SET C2 = 1 WHERE C1 LIKE '333%'; Or this one: UPDATE dbo.Test1 SET C2 = 1 WHERE C1 = '333'; That's because the second two queries have arguments in the filter criteria that allow SQL Server to use the statistics in an index to look for specific matching values and then use the balanced tree, B-Tree, of the index to retrieve specific rows. The argument in the first query requires a full scan against the index because there is no way to know what values might match or any path through the index to simply retrieve them. But, what if we…
Read More
20Jan 2014 by Grant Fritchey 35 Comments

Time for a Quick Rant

Professional Development, SQL Server
This is an actual quote from what we can only assume is a functional human being: The database is very big so we stopped taking backup's. Eight lords a leaping are you kidding me? Seriously! Seriously? By the Great Gu and all the Valkyries in Valhalla, you stopped taking backups of your PRODUCTION database because it was "very big." And I'll put down Brobdingnagian stacks of cash that "very big" in this case is probably 200-500gb or at worst 1-2tb. People, assuming you have enough brain stem intact to regulate breathing, you must know, you must by all the sparkly vampires in Twighlight KNOW that you need to have backups. Right? I mean, nothing ever goes wrong on this shiny marble we call Dirt, does it? No one would EVER…
Read More
15Jan 2014 by Grant Fritchey 17 Comments

Database in Source Control

SQL Server, Tools
Many years ago, I was working with a great DBA. Seriously, a very smart and capable guy. He told me, "We need to put the database into source control, just like app code." And I just laughed. Not because I disagreed with him. I knew he was right, but I had tried, several times, to do just that. See, I'm not really a DBA. I'm a developer. I knew that code (and all the T-SQL that describes databases is code) needed to be versioned, sourced, tracked and audited. But great googly moogly, it was not an easy thing to do. I first tried just exporting the entire database into a script and then occasionally checking that script into source control. Yay! Mission Accomplished... Well, I had a database in source…
Read More
29Oct 2013 by Grant Fritchey 1 Comment

Query Tuning in Dallas

SQL Server, T-SQL
Let's have some fun. This Friday, November 1, 2013, I'm putting on an all day seminar on query tuning. It's set up as a pre-conference event for SQL Saturday 255 in Dallas. It's a 200 level course on understanding how the query optimizer works, the importance of statistics, constraints and indexes, how to read execution plans, and how to take all that knowledge and go to work on tuning your queries. Here's the fun. Sign up for the seminar, and bring a nasty query you've been trying to tune or a query you don't understand or an execution plan that's making you crazy. Depending on the time available near the end of the day, we'll walk through a few of them. I've slightly restructured the seminar so I have some…
Read More
18Sep 2013 by Grant Fritchey 17 Comments

Finding Ad Hoc Queries with Query Hash

SQL Server, T-SQL
I was presenting a session on how to read execution plans when I received a question: Do you have a specific example of how you can use the query hash to identify similar query plans. I do, but I couldn't show it right then, so the person asking requested this blog post. If you're dealing with lots of application generated, dynamic or ad hoc T-SQL queries, then attempting to determine tuning opportunities, missing indexes, incorrect structures, etc., becomes much more difficult because you don't have a single place to go to see what's happening. Each ad hoc query looks different... or do they. Introduced in SQL Server 2008 and available in the standard Dynamic Management Objects (DMO), we have a mechanism to identify ad hoc queries that are similar in…
Read More
16Sep 2013 by Grant Fritchey 1 Comment

Why the Lazy Spool Is Bad

SQL Server, T-SQL
First thing, there are no bad operators, just bad parents, uh, I mean query writers, or database designers, or ORM tools. Why do I say this? Because all the operators within a query execution plan serve a purpose. They are there to fulfill a task. Depending on where and when you see them, they're doing exactly what you ask of them. The issues come up because you're asking them to do a task that they may not be well suited for. This comes from inappropriate structures and inappropriate code. Lazy spools are not really bad (that was just link bait). In fact, depending on the query, what's being done, how you're retrieving data, what data is being retrieved, the lazy spool is actually awesome. But, it's good to know what…
Read More
13Sep 2013 by Grant Fritchey 2 Comments

Are Foreign Keys Better Than Indexes?

SQL Server, T-SQL
When I first saw this question I thought to myself, "Self. Don't you think that's comparing apples to hammers? Yes, Self, I'm pretty sure it is. Good, I thought so too, self. Yeah, me too." After rebooting because of the runaway iterations on that thought, I had another, "Well... hold on there self. Both types of objects, while pretty different, are taken into account by the query optimizer." I then had to admit to myself that I had a point. So the question remains, are foreign keys better than indexes? As my first self said, these are different objects and they fulfill different purposes within SQL Server. My second self wants to point out that when you're dealing with functional objects within SQL Server, it's a bad habit to start…
Read More